Laura Siegemund vs Francesca Jones Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Apr at 02:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Siegemund vs F. Jones

GER
1
Win
Played
1
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Siegemund 1 - 1 Jones
They have played 5 sets in total, with Laura Siegemund winning 2 and Francesca Jones winning 3. The last match between Francesca Jones and Laura Siegemund was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 21-04-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Francesca Jones getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Siegemund | 1 |
| Jones | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(04-21-25)
(R2) Copa Colsanitas - Bogota(04-04-24)
L. Siegemund vs F. Jones H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,657,708 | Career Prize Money | $472,529 |
| 58.97% (549-382) | Career Total W/L | 64.83% (247-134) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 16 | Titles | 11 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 46.67% (14-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.00% (7-13) |
L. Siegemund vs F. Jones Match Preview:
Analyzing the second serve performance in the past six months, Jones has managed to win 36.96% of points on their second serve. In comparison, Siegemund outperforms with a win percentage of 41.91% for the same statistic. This higher efficiency on second serves can indicate an edge in match predictions.
When it comes to return game proficiency, the statistics reveal that Jones has shown superiority, winning 55.85% of their opponent's second serve points. Siegemund, meanwhile, has secured 50.5% of these points. Interestingly, for first serve returns, Siegemund has the upper hand, winning 34.69% as opposed to Jones's 30.81%. Such figures often serve as a predictive guide for determining the favored player in a head-to-head face-off.
The ability to play under pressure is also critical. Jones's success rate lies in saving 51.4% of breakpoints faced, closely rivaled by Siegemund, who has saved slightly more at 52.27%. These stats, divided over recent matches, are valuable for real-time betting predictions.
Over the past year, Jones maintains a commendable win ratio, securing 65.38% of their matches with a win-loss record of 34-18. In contrast, Siegemund holds a percentage of 48.94%, having won 23 and lost 24 matches. This overview provides insight into each player's form and capabilities within the competitive arena.
In terms of playing surfaces, both Jones and Siegemund find clay to be their best surface. Jones boasts a career winning percentage of 69% on clay, whereas Siegemund is slightly behind at 65%. On the opposite end, grass appears to be a challenging surface for Jones with an 18% win rate, while Siegemund demonstrates a balanced 50% on this surface.
Evaluating the level of events each player predominantly participates in, Jones has spent most of the last year engaged in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10K, resulting in a 67.57% win rate from a win-loss tally of 25-12. Siegemund primarily competes on the main tour, securing 52% of matches, ending the year with a 13-12 record. These level-specific statistics are crucial to understanding their competitive exposure.
When it comes to direct head-to-head contests, Siegemund currently leads, having triumphed over Jones in their sole encounter at the Copa Colsanitas in Bogota. This match concluded with a decisive 2:57:06 on the clock, with Siegemund prevailing 6-7(4), 6-4, 6-2. However, an impressive tiebreak victory from Jones illustrates their potential in extreme pressure situations.
Considering the opponent quality faced over the past 12 months, Jones has played against challengers averaging a rank of 245, while Siegemund has contended with opponents averaging a rank of 142.91. Such statistics underline the relative toughness of competition faced by each player.
In matches extending to a deciding set, Jones has a higher win percentage of 41% within the last year compared to Siegemund's 38%. This detail provides a subtle predictive advantage if the upcoming match goes the distance. Despite this, the break point conversion in recent form remains almost identical; Jones converts 35.33% of opportunities, closely matched by Siegemund's conversion rate at 35.26%.
With these comprehensive performance statistics and prior head-to-head outcomes, the statistical evidence leans slightly in favor of Siegemund to emerge victorious in the upcoming bout, although both players exhibit competitive capabilities that may lead to an engaging and unpredictable clash.
Laura Siegemund vs Francesca Jones Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Siegemund vs F. Jones H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 25 | Games Won | 25 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 2:17:14 | Average Match Time | 2:17:14 |
| 73% (114/157) | 1st Serve % | 59% (98/165) |
| 54% (61/114) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (61/98) |
| 47% (20/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (25/67) |
| 57% (12/21) | Break Pts Won % | 52% (11/21) |
| 48% (79/165) | Return Points Win % | 48% (76/157) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Siegemund Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
R3 | W | 6-4 7-6(2) | ||
R2 | W | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 4-6 4-1 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
F. Jones Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 5-7 6-0 1-0 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
SF | L | 7-6(0) 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 7-6(6) | ||

L. Siegemund vs F. Jones Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.16% (549/379) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.83% (247/134) |
| 57.31% (1227/914) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.48% (551/317) |
| 52.94% (10356/9205) | Games Win/Loss | 55.37% (4352/3508) |
| 51.56% (149/140) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.06% (37/29) |
| 64.58% (341/187) | Clay Win/Loss | 70.59% (192/80) |
| 52.63% (40/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.85% (14/12) |
| 54.29% (19/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 23.53% (4/13) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 455 | Aces Total | 537 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.5 |
| 1721 | Total Double Faults | 1914 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:33:55 |
| 483.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 439.42 |
| 70% (25179/35936) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15301/24561) |
| 60% (15144/25179) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (9731/15301) |
| 46% (4959/10739) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (3980/9261) |
| 48% (2247/4717) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1606/3163) |
| 46% (16788/36343) | Return Points Win % | 48% (11489/24026) |
| 53.33% (48/42) | Slam W/L | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 54.90% (56/46) | Masters W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (144/112) | Main Tour W/L | 47.50% (19/21) |
| 60.35% (239/157) | Challenger W/L | 68.04% (149/70) |
| 75.32% (58/19) | Futures W/L | 70.33% (64/27) |
| 59% (540/914) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (245/361) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/11) |
| 51% (96/187) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 72% (57/79) |
| 54% (157/291) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (60/106) |
| 87% (530/459) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (251/222) |
| 13% (530/71) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (251/29) |
| 22% (397/89) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (130/26) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
